By: Ted Underwood
Woo! — very impressive. If only all institutions were run this well, and with this much openness to experiment.
View ArticleBy: Matthew Wilkens
This is really good; thanks for both the openness and the hard work behind it. One thought for future iterations of the conference: Have you considered changing the length of abstracts (maybe...
View ArticleBy: Bethany Nowviskie
Ted, thanks for your kind words! After the conference, we’ll be sure to share some reflections on how things went — not only as formal reports for the ADHO CCC, but also in a public venue, so we can...
View ArticleBy: Cultivating the Virtues of DH | Christopher P. Long
[...] reviewers) even as it ensured the sort of academic excellence upon which the ADHO rightly insists. Bethany Nowviskie has a great post describing the process; that post articulates well how the...
View ArticleBy: Analyzing submissions to Digital Humanities 2013 | the scottbot irregular
[…] the extent to which these preferences will be accommodated, as this is an experiment on their part. Bethany Nowviskie describes it here. As a potential reviewer, I just went through the process of...
View Article
